Costing for Navision 4.0 Technical White Paper Costing Technical PDF White Paper Published: May 2004 This paper is intended for people who are involved in the implementation of costing functionality at a customer site and for those who need to advise customers or make modifications within the area. It gives an overview of the principles used within the costing area of Microsoft Business Solutions–Navision 4.00. Several in-depth examples are provided. Table of Contents Inventory Adjustment and Reconciliation with General Ledger The Effect of Costing Method on Valuing Inventory Increases The Effect of Costing Method When Assigning Value to Inventory Decreases Calculating Revaluable Quantity Determining Whether an Inventory Decrease Is Affected by a Revaluation Appendix 1 – Controlling Accounts Posted to in General Ledger Calculating the Amount to Post to General Ledger Appendix 2 – Variance Calculation for Manufactured Items Appendix 3 – Capacity Ledger Entry Diagram
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Item Ledger Entries |
|||||||||
Posting Date |
Entry Type |
Quantity |
Entry No. |
||||||
01-01-03 |
Purchase |
10 |
1 |
||||||
Value Entries |
|||||||||
Posting Date |
Entry Type |
Cost Amount (Actual) |
Cost Posted to G/L |
Item Ledger Entry No. |
Entry No. |
||||
01-01-03 |
Direct Cost |
70 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
||||
01-01-03 |
Indirect Cost |
10 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
||||
Item Application Entries |
||||
Entry No. |
Item Ledger Entry No. |
Inbound Item Entry No. |
Outbound Item Entry No. |
Quantity |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
Item Ledger Entries
Posting Date |
Entry Type |
Quantity |
Entry No. |
01-15-03 |
Sale |
-10 |
2 |
Value Entries
Posting Date |
Entry Type |
Cost Amount (Actual) |
Cost Posted to G/L |
Item Ledger Entry No. |
Entry No. |
01-15-03 |
Direct Cost |
-80 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
Item Application Entries
Entry No. |
Item Ledger Entry No. |
Inbound Item Entry No. |
Outbound Item Entry No. |
Quantity |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
-10 |
At the end of the month, the user can reconcile these straightforward inventory transactions – which do not need cost adjustment - with the general ledger by running the Post Inventory Cost to G/L batch job. The posting date is 01-31-03. The program updates the Cost Posted to G/L and creates the following G/L entries:
Value Entries
Posting Date |
Entry Type |
Cost Amount (Actual) |
Cost Posted to G/L |
Item Ledger Entry No. |
Entry No. |
01-01-03 |
Direct Cost |
70 |
70 |
1 |
1 |
01-01-03 |
Indirect Cost |
10 |
10 |
1 |
2 |
01-15-03 |
Direct Cost |
-80 |
-80 |
2 |
3 |
G/L Entries
Posting Date |
G/L Account No. |
Amount |
Entry No. |
01-31-03 |
<Inventory Account> |
70 |
1 |
01-31-03 |
<Direct Cost Applied Account> |
-70 |
2 |
01-31-03 |
<Inventory Account> |
10 |
3 |
01-31-03 |
<Overhead Applied Account> |
-10 |
4 |
01-31-03 |
<Inventory Account> |
-80 |
5 |
01-31-03 |
<COGS Account> |
80 |
6 |
There are two ways to reconcile the inventory ledger with the general ledger:
Activate the automatic cost posting option
Use the Post Inventory Cost to G/L batch job
When the user has activated this option, the program automatically posts to the general ledger every time the user posts to the inventory ledger. The posting date of the G/L entry will be equal to the posting date of the item journal line.
When the user runs this batch job, the program creates G/L entries on the basis of value entries. The entries can be summarized per posting group. The user sets the posting date of the G/L entry on the request form for the batch job.
The Post Inventory Cost to G/L batch job allows the user to post adjustments, which were recognized after the accounting period was closed, to an open accounting period. The advantage is that these adjustments can be posted without reopening a closed accounting period.
However, if the batch job request form is not filled in carefully, it is possible to end up in a situation where inventory ledger and general ledger balances are out of sync. The Posting Date field on the Options tab and the filter on the Posting Date field on the Value Entry tab are the most important settings.
Before running the Post Inventory Cost to G/L batch job, it is important to run the Adjust Cost – Item Entries batch job. The main purpose of this batch job is to update COGS for sales entries, as this is not always possible to calculate at the time of posting. An item can, for example, be sales invoiced before it has been purchase invoiced. In order to make a correct inventory valuation while allowing this flexibility, it is necessary to make a cost adjustment some time later by running the Adjust Cost – Item Entries batch job.
Another key purpose of this batch job is to update the unit cost on the item card. Because of this, we recommend running the Adjust Cost – Item Entries batch job as often as possible, during non-working hours. This ensures that the unit cost is updated for items on a daily basis.
The Adjust Cost – Item Entries batch job creates value entries for rounding and adjustment. The new adjustment and rounding value entries have the posting dates of the original value entries, unless those value entries fall within a closed accounting period, meaning that the posting date is earlier than the date in the Allow Posting From field in the general ledger setup. In this case, the batch job assigns the posting date that the user entered in the request form in the Closed Period Entry Posting Date field.
The user posts a purchased item as received and invoiced on 01-01-03. The user later posts the sold item as shipped and invoiced on 01-15-03. The user runs the Adjust Cost – Item Entries and Post Inventory to G/L batch jobs with the posting date set to 01-31-03. The following entries are created:
Value Entries
Posting Date |
Item Ledger Entry Type |
Cost Amount (Actual) |
Cost Posted to G/L |
Invoiced Quantity |
G/L Entry No. (Account) |
G/L Entry No. (Bal. Account) |
Entry No. |
01-01-03 |
Purchase |
10.00 |
10.00 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
01-15-03 |
Sale |
-10.00 |
-10.00 |
-1 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
G/L Entries
Posting Date |
G/L Account No. |
Description |
Amount |
Entry No. |
01-31-03 |
2130 |
Inventory Account |
10.00 |
1 |
01-31-03 |
7291 |
Direct Cost Applied Account |
-10.00 |
2 |
01-31-03 |
2130 |
Inventory Account |
-10.00 |
3 |
01-31-03 |
7290 |
COGS Account |
10.00 |
4 |
Later, the user posts a related purchase item charge for 2.00 LCY as invoiced on 02-10-03. The user runs the Adjust Cost – Item Entries batch job and then runs the Post Inventory to G/L batch job with the posting date set to 02-28-03. The final result is as follows. Note that the adjustment of COGS is now recognized in February for the G/L entries.
Value Entries
Posting Date |
Item Ledger Entry Type |
Cost Amount (Actual) |
Cost Posted to G/L |
Invoiced Quantity |
G/L Entry No. (Account) |
G/L Entry No. (Bal. Account) |
Adjustment |
Entry No. |
02-10-03 |
Purchase |
2.00 |
2.00 |
0 |
5 |
6 |
No |
3 |
01-15-03 |
Sale |
-2.00 |
-2.00 |
0 |
7 |
8 |
Yes |
4 |
G/L Entries
Posting Date |
G/L Account No. |
Description |
Amount |
Entry No. |
02-28-03 |
2130 |
Inventory Account |
2.00 |
5 |
02-28-03 |
7791 |
Direct Cost Applied Account |
-2.00 |
6 |
02-28-03 |
2130 |
Inventory Account |
-2.00 |
7 |
02-28-03 |
7290 |
COGS Account |
2.00 |
8 |
When only the quantity part of an inventory increase has been posted, the inventory value will not change unless the user has activated the expected cost posting to general ledger option. In this case, the expected cost is posted to interim accounts at the time of receipt. Once the receipt has been completely invoiced, the interim accounts are then balanced and the actual cost is posted to the inventory account.
Starting in version 4.00, for reconciliation and traceability purposes, the invoiced value entry shows the expected cost amount that has been posted to balance the interim accounts.
In the following example, the user has activated automatic cost posting and expected cost posting to general ledger.
The user posts a purchase order as received. The expected cost is LCY 95.
Value Entries
Posting Date |
Entry Type |
Cost Amount (Expected) |
Expected Cost Posted to G/L |
Expected Cost |
G/L Entry No. (Interim Acc.) |
G/L Entry No. (Int. Bal. Acc.) |
Item Ledger Entry No. |
Entry No. |
01-01-03 |
Direct Cost |
95 |
95 |
Yes |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
G/L Entries
Posting Date |
G/L Account No. |
Amount |
Entry No. |
01-01-03 |
<Invt. Accrual Acc. (Interim)> |
-95 |
2 |
01-01-03 |
<Inventory Account (Interim)> |
95 |
1 |
At a later date, the user posts the purchase order as invoiced. The invoiced cost is LCY 100.
Value Entries
Posting Date |
Cost Amount (Actual) |
Cost Amount (Ex-pected) |
Cost Posted to G/L |
Ex-pected Cost |
G/L Entry No. (Account) |
G/L Entry No. (Bal. Account) |
G/L Entry No. (Interim Acc.) |
G/L Entry No. (Int. Bal. Acc.) |
Item Ledger Entry No. |
Entry No. |
01-15-03 |
100 |
-95 |
100 |
No |
5 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
The invoice posting clears the interim account and posts the invoiced amount to the inventory account.
G/L Entries
Posting Date |
G/L Account No. |
Amount |
Entry No. |
01-15-03 |
<Invt. Accrual Acc. (Interim)> |
95 |
4 |
01-15-03 |
<Inventory Account (Interim)> |
-95 |
3 |
01-15-03 |
<Direct Cost Applied Account> |
-100 |
6 |
01-15-03 |
<Inventory Account> |
100 |
5 |
During reconciliation, inventory values are posted to the inventory account in the balance sheet, and the same amount, but with the reverse sign, is posted to the relevant balancing account. The balancing account is, in most cases, an income statement account. However, when posting direct cost related to consumption or output, it is a balance sheet account. The type of the item ledger entry and value entry determines which G/L account to post to.
This example, which describes a chain that is manufactured from purchased links, gives an overview of the various account types that are used in a typical scenario. The user has activated the expected cost posting option. The details are as follows:
Link: Costing method = Standard
Standard cost = LCY 1
Overhead rate = LCY 0.02
Chain: Costing method = Standard
Standard cost = LCY 150
Overhead rate = LCY 25
Work center: Direct cost per minute = LCY 2
Indirect cost % = 10%
2a. The interim accounts are cleared.
2b. The direct cost is posted.
2c. The indirect cost is calculated and posted.
2d. The purchase variance is calculated and posted (only for standard-cost items).
Inventory (Interim) |
Inventory Accrual (Interim) |
||||||||||
1. 2a. |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
|||||||
Inventory |
Direct Cost |
Indirect Cost |
Purchase Variance |
||||||||
2b. 2c. 2d. |
165 3 |
18 |
165 |
3 |
18 |
||||||
4a. The interim accounts are cleared.
4b. COGS is posted.
Inventory (Interim) |
COGS (Interim) |
Inventory |
COGS |
||||||||
3. 4a. 4b. |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
|||||
Material:
Inventory |
WIP |
||||||||||
5. |
150 |
150 |
|||||||||
6a. The direct costs are posted.
6b. The indirect costs are calculated and posted.
Capacity:
Direct Cost |
WIP |
Indirect Cost |
|||||||||
6a. 6b. |
120 |
120 12 |
12 |
||||||||
8a. The interim accounts are cleared.
8b. The direct cost is transferred from the WIP account to the inventory account.
8c. The indirect cost (overhead) is transferred from the indirect cost account to the inventory account.
8d. This results in a variance amount of LCY 157 (variances are only calculated for standard-cost items).
WIP |
Inventory (Interim) |
||||||||||
7. 8a. |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
|||||||
WIP |
Inventory |
Indirect Cost |
Variance |
||||||||
8b. 8c. 8d. |
282 |
282 25 |
157 |
25 |
157 |
||||||
For the sake of simplicity, only one variance account is shown. In reality, five different accounts exist: Material, Capacity, Capacity Overhead, Subcontracting and Manufacturing Overhead variance.
Inventory |
Inventory Adjustment |
||||||||||
9. |
10 |
10 |
|||||||||
The exact relationship between the above-mentioned account types and the different types of value entries is shown in Appendix 1 – Controlling Accounts Posted to in General Ledger.
Cost components are different types of costs that comprise the value of an inventory increase or decrease. They can be grouped into the following general types:
Direct cost—cost that can be traced directly to a cost object
Indirect cost—cost that is allocated without direct traceability to a cost object
Variance—the difference between actual and standard costs, which is only posted for items using the standard costing method
Revaluation—a depreciation or appreciation of the current inventory value
Rounding—residuals caused by the way in which valuation of inventory decreases are calculated
Some of these costs can be broken down further. The direct cost of an item, for example, can consist of the following cost components:
Item cost (= direct purchase price)
Freight cost
Insurance cost
Freight and insurance costs are item charges that can be added to an item’s cost at any time. When the user runs the Adjust Cost – Item Entries batch job, the program updates the value of any related inventory decreases accordingly.
The different types of variance are listed below. These are described more thoroughly in the section on Variance Calculation.
Purchase
Material
Capacity
Subcontracted
Capacity Overhead
Manufacturing Overhead
Microsoft Business Solutions–Navision supports the following costing methods:
FIFO (First In First Out)
LIFO (Last In First Out)
Average
Specific
Standard
They all have one thing in common—when the quantity on inventory is zero, the inventory value must also be zero. However, the costing methods differ in the way that they value inventory decreases and whether they use actual cost or standard cost as the valuation base.
The following sequence of inventory increases and decreases is used below to show the effects of different costing methods. Note that the resulting quantity on inventory is zero, and consequently the inventory value must also be zero, regardless of the costing method.
Posting Date |
Quantity |
Entry No. |
01-01-03 |
1 |
1 |
01-01-03 |
1 |
2 |
01-01-03 |
1 |
3 |
02-01-03 |
-1 |
4 |
03-01-03 |
-1 |
5 |
04-01-03 |
-1 |
6 |
If the costing method uses actual cost (FIFO, LIFO, Average or Specific costing method) as the valuation base, then the inventory increases are valued as shown below.
Posting Date |
Quantity |
Cost Amount (Actual) |
Entry No. |
01-01-03 |
1 |
12 |
1 |
01-01-03 |
1 |
14 |
2 |
01-01-03 |
1 |
16 |
3 |
If the costing method uses standard cost as the valuation base, then the inventory increases are valued as shown below.
Posting Date |
Quantity |
Cost Amount (Actual) |
Entry No. |
01-01-03 |
1 |
15 |
1 |
01-01-03 |
1 |
15 |
2 |
01-01-03 |
1 |
15 |
3 |
The FIFO costing method assigns the value of the first increases on inventory (entry no. 1, 2, 3). COGS is calculated using the value of the first inventory acquisitions.
Posting Date |
Quantity |
Cost Amount (Actual) |
Entry No. |
02-01-03 |
-1 |
-12 |
4 |
03-01-03 |
-1 |
-14 |
5 |
04-01-03 |
-1 |
-16 |
6 |
The LIFO costing method assigns the value of the last increases on inventory (entry no. 3, 2, 1). COGS is calculated using the value of the most recent inventory acquisitions.
Posting Date |
Quantity |
Cost Amount (Actual) |
Entry No. |
02-01-03 |
-1 |
-16 |
4 |
03-01-03 |
-1 |
-14 |
5 |
04-01-03 |
-1 |
-12 |
6 |
The average costing method calculates a weighted average of the remaining inventory on the valuation date of the inventory decrease. (This calculation is described in detail in the section Average Cost Calculation.)
Posting Date |
Quantity |
Cost Amount (Actual) |
Entry No. |
02-01-03 |
-1 |
-14 |
4 |
03-01-03 |
-1 |
-14 |
5 |
04-01-03 |
-1 |
-14 |
6 |
The standard costing method works similarly to FIFO. The difference is that the inventory increases are valued at standard cost (rather than actual cost), which affects the value of the inventory decreases.
Posting Date |
Quantity |
Cost Amount (Actual) |
Entry No. |
02-01-03 |
-1 |
-15 |
4 |
03-01-03 |
-1 |
-15 |
5 |
04-01-03 |
-1 |
-15 |
6 |
The costing method makes an assumption about how cost flows from inventory increase to inventory decrease. However, if more accurate information about the cost flow exists, a user can override this assumption by creating a fixed application between entries. A fixed application creates a link between an inventory decrease and a specific inventory increase and will direct the cost flow accordingly. In Microsoft Navision, a fixed application has the same effect as